In Trnava on 27. 1. 2024

Dear reviewer,

You are kindly asked to support our journal by writing a brief reviewer’s report of an article that has been submitted to the editors for publication.

Your service is not yet honoured, as we are only at the beginning of the journal’s publication – we appreciate your willingness to participate even more.

If you are unable to write a review, please notify the editor immediately.

However, if you will accept our request for a review, please, read the following.

Information to the reviewer for the journal Dialogues in Education

The goals of peer review are:

1.	to help improve the author’s paper by pointing out strengths and weaknesses that may not be apparent to the author (please consult the “Instructions for Authors” and “General Instructions” on the journal’s website);

2.	to help fulfil the mission of Dialogue in Education (DinE): “The main thematic focuses of the researches published on the journal are the following: philosophical, ethical, and historical foundations of education and general pedagogy in dialogical approach, with particular emphasis on the value, moral and personal dimensions of education and teaching. The title of the journal incorporates a paradigm of dialogue and identifies it in human affairs, especially concerning educational relationships. […] Authors are encouraged to develop educational research in dialogue about dialogue and for dialogue. Theoretical and empirical studies, review studies, researchinprogress reports, essays, discussions and polemics, infield publications reviews, and relevant reports are invited to be published as well;”

3.	to help apply the ethical standards of reviewing recommended by Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

If you are ready to consider the article, we sent you attached, please fill out the following form.

Thank you very much for your cooperation.

Andrej Rajský
EditorinChief of the journal Dialogues in Education

Form for the Reviewer

Title of the paper: Click or tap here and enter your text.

Reviewer: Click or tap here and enter your text.

Yes	Partially	No
1.	Does the article belong thematically to Dialogues in Education?	☐	☐	☐
2.	Does the title of the article describe its content clearly enough?	☐	☐	☐
3.	Are the abstract and keywords adequate?	☐	☐	☐
4.	Were the basic sections (Introduction, Main Part, Conclusion, References) complete and adequate? Did the writer use headings and subheadings well to clarify the text sections?	☐	☐	☐
5.	Was the correct research method used in the article? (applies to both theoretical studies and empirical research)	☐	☐	☐
6.	Are the ideas and findings presented in the text original?	☐	☐	☐
7.	Are the interpretations/conclusions presented acceptable and adequately justified?	☐	☐	☐
8.	Are the bibliographical references complete?	☐	☐	☐
9.	Is the article grammatically and stylistically, correct? Are the ideas presented clearly articulated?	☐	☐	☐
10.	Are you willing to review a revised version of the article (second round of peerreviewing)?	☐	☐	☐

Overall Assessment:	Accept	☐
Minor adjustments required	☐
Significant adjustments required, submit for reassessment	☐
Reject	☐

Please include below comments intended for the author(s).

What are the strengths and the weaknesses of the paper?

Click or tap here and enter your text.

Please include confidential notes intended for editors only:

Click or tap here and enter your text.